First, you have 1 minute to look at the information and prepare what you are going to say. You will then have 1 minute to leave your message. The visual information will stay on the screen. Please speak for all the time you have.

You have been asked to make a review about mobile phones. This grid shows some information about the best smartphones on the market. Look at the table and then give your presentation.

First, you have 1 minute to look at the information and prepare what you are going to say. You will then have 1 minute to leave your message. The visual information will stay on the screen. Please speak for all the time you have.

First, you have 1 minute to look at the information and prepare what you are going to say. You will then have 1 minute to leave your message. The visual information will stay on the screen. Please speak for all the time you have.

You have been asked to give a presentation about acid rain. This diagram shows the formation and effects of acid rain. Look at the diagram and then give your presentation, explaining how pollution causes acid rain.

You will hear people talking in eight different situations. For questions 1 – 8, choose the best answer (A, B or C).

El día 16 de agosto de 2009 ingresa en el centro penitenciario Murcia II el ciudadanos marroquí Mohamed Abdul mediante orden de detención de la policía judicial y  la ciudadana española Dolores Tinoco mediante mandamiento de prisión del Juzgado de lo Penal número 2 de Cartagena.

La interna Dolores al segundo día pide a la funcionaria del módulo que quiere estar con su hijo de 35 meses ya que no tiene nadie en la calle para cuidar del niño. Esa misma tarde ingresa Pedro López Castro, para cumplir una ejecutoria de 12 meses de prisión.

Responda a las siguientes preguntas:

Los funcionarios Miguel TT y Pedro SS, prestan servicio en el módulo 4 del Centro Penitenciario Murcia. A primera hora de la tarde, cuando se procede a la apertura de celdas, observarán como los internos Pedro Pablo León Jaramillo y Jorge Mula López, no se levantan de su cama para formar debidamente y así poder hacer el recuento establecido, alegando ambos que se encuentran enfermos y apenas tienen fuerza.

Los funcionarios requieren la presencia del jefe de servicios y notifican su situación a los servicios médicos del centro. Inmediatamente se personan todos los citados en la celda de los internos, y tras un primer reconocimiento in situ médico, indica al jefe de servicios que los internos presentan un cuadro vírico, con alta probabilidad de contagio.

Conteste a las siguientes preguntas:

Antonio RL es un interno penado, que cumple condena en el Centro Penitenciario Murcia I, por un delito de asesinato. Desde hace unas semanas padece una enfermedad infecto-contagiosa (Gonorrea), necesitando bastante medicación. En la farmacia del centro no se dispone de toda la medicación que requiere la enfermedad, concretamente el medicamento «amoxicilina».

Antonio estuvo trabajando en libertad como soldador y tubero, en una empresa subcontratista. Debido a los años trabajados, ha perdido capacidad visual y auditiva, necesitando gafas graduadas y un audífono.

Antonio tiene conocimiento de su enfermedad porque un funcionario, que conocía desde hace muchos años porque fueron vecinos, accedió a su historia clínica y observó realmente la enfermedad que padecía, haciéndoselo saber. A partir de ese momento, Antonio preocupado por su estado de salud, solicita ser atendido por los servicios médicos, pero no es posible, informándole que al ser un Centro Penitenciario con menos de 500 internos, el médico solo pasa consulta un día a la semana en su módulo concretamente los viernes. Antonio, no puede esperar tanto tiempo debido a que se encuentra mal y solicita asistencia especializada, y si no fuera posible solicita ser tratado por servicios médicos privados, ajenos a Instituciones Penitenciarias.

Conteste a las siguientes preguntas:

Pedro Pablo León Jaramillo es un interno penado, cumpliendo condena de 15 años de prisión por un asesinato. Se encuentra ubicado en el departamento de enfermería del Centro Penitenciario Murcia I, por estar aquejado de una enfermedad grave. La farmacia del Centro Penitenciario no dispone de dos de los medicamentos que requiere la enfermedad de Pedro Pablo, concretamente son tamoxifero y durogesic.

El estado de salud de Pedro Pablo empeora considerablemente, por lo que es trasladado al Hospital Extrapenitenciario de Murcia. Una vez ingresado, se presentan a visitarlo 3 familiares directos y 2 amigos de la infancia, pero por no ser el día que tiene establecido el Centro Penitenciario para la celebración de comunicaciones orales, no se les autoriza comunicar a ninguno.

Tras un mes de ingreso, Pedro Pablo mejora considerablemente, por lo que es trasladado nuevamente al Centro Penitenciario Murcia I. Ingresando en el departamento de enfermería. Finalmente Pedro Pablo fallece dos meses después de un infarto.

Conteste a las siguientes preguntas:

Con fecha 11 de octubre de 2016, en el CP Murcia II se reúne, a petición de parte de sus miembros y por primera vez, el Consejo Social Penitenciario Local, adscrito a dicho centro, para conocer la planificación anual de las acciones y programas terapéuticos a la reinserción desarrollados en el centro.
La presidencia es asumida por el titula de la Subdirección de Régimen, al encontrarse ausente el director del centro por estar disfrutando de un permiso de paternidad. Como secretario del Consejo se designa al titular de la Subdirección de Seguridad.

Conteste a las siguientes preguntas:

You are going to read a review of a book about sport and philosophy. For questions 1–6,
choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.

Knowing the score

 

William Skidelsky reviews David Papineau’s new book, in which sport meets philosophy. David Papineau is an eminent philosopher and a passionate lover of sport. For much of his life, he has kept the two spheres separate, fearing that to mix them would produce a double negative in his readers’ appreciation of his work: philosophy robbed of its seriousness and sport of its excitement. Then, in 2012, a colleague invited him to contribute to a lecture series titled ‘Philosophy and Sport’, organised to coincide with that year’s Olympics. ‘I couldn’t really refuse’, Papineau recalls. ‘I had an extensive knowledge of both philosophy and sport. If I wasn’t going to say yes, who would?’

For his topic, he chose the role of conscious thought in fast-reaction sports, such as tennis, cricket and baseball. How, he wondered, do top tennis players like Rafael Nadal and Serena Williams use anything other than ‘automatic reflexes’ in the half-second (or less) they have to return their opponent’s serve? How do they choose to hit the ball this way or that, to apply topspin or slice? Thinking about this not only proved ‘great fun’, but allowed Papineau to come away with a series of ‘substantial philosophical conclusions’ about the relationship between intentions and action.

After this, the floodgates were open. Having breached his self-imposed division, Papineau set about applying his philosopher’s brain to a range of other sporting topics. Five years on, those inquiries have resulted in a book, Knowing the Score. This is essentially a collection of essays on whatever sporting questions happen to interest
its author. It isn’t comprehensive, nor does it advance an overarching argument. The tone – informal, anecdotal, contrarian – is more popular philosophy than academic. What unifies the book is the consistency of its approach rather than of its content: he isn’t interested only in applying philosophical ideas and principles to sport. More importantly – and more originally – he wants to use arguments about sport as a launching pad into philosophy.

A good example comes in a chapter dealing with rulebreaking, in which Papineau sets off with a sporting example in order to draw parallels with broader contexts. He points out that what is acceptable in sport isn’t defined by the rules alone. Sometimes it’s usual to ignore them – as footballers do when they pull on opponents’ shirts as the ball flies towards them. Other actions stem from a sense of fair play – such as halting the game when an opponent is lying injured – rather than arising directly from rules. Rules are just one constraint on behaviour; all sports also have codes of fair play, which operate alongside the rules, and which, in some cases, override them. Complicating matters further is
the fact that official authority ultimately has a force that is greater than both. Whatever a sport’s rules or codes specify, the referee or ruling body’s decision is final.

Papineau argues that there’s a ‘remarkably close’ analogy between sport’s multi-level structure and the factors that constrain us in ordinary life. In sport, you can ignore the rules and still play fairly, or obey the law while being thought a cheat; similarly, in a society, citizens can break the law and still do the right thing, or comply with the law yet still indulge in objectionable behaviour. A sport’s codes aren’t the same as its rules; likewise, in life, we draw a distinction between virtue and legal compliance. Papineau argues that we have no general obligation to obey the law; only to do what we think is right. Yet, saying that we’re not obliged to obey the law isn’t the same as saying that we don’t have a duty to respect the state’s authority. If people didn’t accept that police officers are generally entitled to tell them what to do, society might descend into chaos. Likewise, if footballers stopped listening when referees blow their whistles, the game would become a free-for-all.

Knowing the Score covers an impressive amount ofground. At a time when data analysis dominates ‘serious’ discussion of sport, Papineau’s faith in the power of anecdote and reasoning is refreshing. The author at times gives the impression of being the sort of person who knows he’s the cleverest in the room. For the most part, however, he barely puts a foot wrong in what is a blinder of a performance.